Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Kubota B7400
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota B7400
Utility
- power
- 16 hp
- displacement
- 43.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1200
vs
KubotaKubota B7400
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied120016 hp
B740016 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1200 is in the 4th percentile; B7400 is in the 4th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1200 higher · +5.2 ci (+12%)120049.1 ci
B740043.9 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; B7400 is in the 1st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ B7400 higher · +1 (+50%)12002
B74003
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; B7400 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1200 higher · +56 lb (+4%)12001,344 lb
B74001,288 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1200 is in the 4th percentile; B7400 is in the 3rd · 5,107 models
1200 (A)B7400 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 1200 | B7400 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Kubota | — |
| Model | LEK802D | D722-E-D16 | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | 16hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,900RPM | ▲ B7400+200 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ B7400+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 43.9ci | ▲ 1200+5.2 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 2.6in | ▲ 1200+0.5 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.7in | ▲ 1200+0.4 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 89.8in | ▲ 1200+5.1 in · +6% |
| Width | 42.2in | 38.6in | ▲ 1200+3.6 in · +9% |
| Height | 79in | 75.2in | ▲ 1200+3.8 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 1,288lb | ▲ 1200+56 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,500rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 1,356lb | ▲ B7400+475 lb · +54% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | 0.7gal | ▲ 1200+0.4 gal · +57% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Kubota B7400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 4th percentile (16 hp)B · 4th percentile (16 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 1st percentile (43.9 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,288 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 6th percentile (94.9 in)B · 4th percentile (89.8 in)
A · 1200B · B7400Median Utility Tractor