Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 1220
Utility
- power
- 17 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1220 vs Mitsubishi MT17
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT17
Utility
- power
- 17 hp
- displacement
- 59.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
FordFord 1220
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT17
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied122017 hp
MT1717 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1220 is in the 5th percentile; MT17 is in the 5th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT17 higher · +1.5 ci (+3%)122058.2 ci
MT1759.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1220 is in the 5th percentile; MT17 is in the 5th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied12203
MT173
Median Utility Tractor4
1220 is in the 23rd percentile; MT17 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
1220 (A)MT17 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 1220 | MT17 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | S753 | L3E | — |
| Power Output | 17hp | 17hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 59.7ci | ▲ MT17+1.5 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 2.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 40.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 80.1in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Mitsubishi MT17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open Operator Station with two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 5th percentile (17 hp)B · 5th percentile (17 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 5th percentile (59.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · 1220B · MT17Median Utility Tractor