Head to head · Utility
Ford 1310 vs Yanmar YM195
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM195
Utility
- power
- 19 hp
- displacement
- 60.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 1310
vs
YanmarYanmar YM195
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied131019 hp
YM19519 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1310 is in the 7th percentile; YM195 is in the 7th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ YM195 higher · +2.6 ci (+4%)131058.2 ci
YM19560.8 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1310 is in the 5th percentile; YM195 is in the 6th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1310 higher · +1 (+50%)13103
YM1952
Median Utility Tractor4
1310 is in the 23rd percentile; YM195 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1310 higher · +4 (+50%)131012
YM1958
Median Utility Tractor12
1310 is in the 50th percentile; YM195 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
1310 (A)YM195 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1310 | YM195 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | S753 | 2T84A | — |
| Power Output | 19hp | 19hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 1310+400 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 1310+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 60.8ci | ▲ YM195+2.6 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ YM195+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.5in | ▲ YM195+0.7 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift, unsynchronized gear or partially synchronized | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 109in | 111in | ▲ YM195+2 in · +2% |
| Width | 49.6in | 47.6in | ▲ 1310+2 in · +4% |
| Height | 82.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,063lb | 1,620lb | ▲ 1310+443 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission or live (optional) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,432lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.7gal | 1.1gal | ▲ YM195+0.4 gal · +57% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1310 | Yanmar YM195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 7th percentile (19 hp)B · 7th percentile (19 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 6th percentile (60.8 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,063 lb)B · 8th percentile (1,620 lb)
A · 1310B · YM195Median Utility Tractor