Head to head · Utility
Ford 1320 vs Massey Ferguson 1726E
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1726E
Utility
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 1320
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1726E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1726E higher · +4 hp (+20%)132020 hp
1726E24 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1320 is in the 8th percentile; 1726E is in the 14th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1726E higher · +14 ci (+18%)132077.3 ci
1726E91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1320 is in the 11th percentile; 1726E is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied13203
1726E3
Median Utility Tractor4
1320 is in the 23rd percentile; 1726E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied13209
1726E9
Median Utility Tractor12
1320 is in the 35th percentile; 1726E is in the 35th · 4,941 models
1320 (A)1726E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 1320 | 1726E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | J823 | N843T-F | — |
| Power Output | 20hp | 24hp | ▲ 1726E+4 hp · +20% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1726E+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 77.3ci | 91.3ci | ▲ 1726E+14 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3.3in | ▲ 1726E+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.5in | ▲ 1726E+0.4 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 116in | ▲ 1726E+4 in · +4% |
| Width | 58.7in | 52.4in | ▲ 1320+6.3 in · +12% |
| Height | 82.3in | 97.6in | ▲ 1726E+15.3 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 2,115lb | 2,600lb | ▲ 1726E+485 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Transmission | Same |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,740lb | 1,598lb | ▲ 1320+142 lb · +9% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet Disc | Wet disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1320 | Massey Ferguson 1726E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (20 hp)B · 14th percentile (24 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.3 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,115 lb)B · 18th percentile (2,600 lb)
A · 1320B · 1726EMedian Utility Tractor