Head to head · Utility
Ford 1520 vs New Holland 1630
New HollandModel B
New Holland 1630
Utility
- power
- 27.3 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 1520
vs
New HollandNew Holland 1630
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1630 higher · +5.3 hp (+24%)152022 hp
163027.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1520 is in the 11th percentile; 1630 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied152081.2 ci
163081.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1520 is in the 13th percentile; 1630 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied15203
16303
Median Utility Tractor4
1520 is in the 23rd percentile; 1630 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied15209
16309
Median Utility Tractor12
1520 is in the 35th percentile; 1630 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
1520 (A)1630 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1520 | 1630 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | J843 | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 22hp | 27.3hp | ▲ 1630+5.3 hp · +24% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1630+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 81.2ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 48in | 54.3in | ▲ 1630+6.3 in · +13% |
| Height | 84.3in | 87.8in | ▲ 1630+3.5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 2,156lb | 2,474lb | ▲ 1630+318 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Middle PTO: Live (hydro), Rear PTO: Continuous live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,934lb | 1,920lb | ▲ 1520+14 lb · <1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Wet disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1520 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | Two-post fixed ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 11th percentile (22 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,156 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,474 lb)
A · 1520B · 1630Median Utility Tractor