Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1600 vs Yanmar FV-230
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FV-230
Utility
- power
- 23.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 24
FordFord 1600
vs
YanmarYanmar FV-230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FV-230 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)160023.1 hp
FV-23023.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1600 is in the 13th percentile; FV-230 is in the 13th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FV-230 higher · +13.7 ci (+18%)160077.6 ci
FV-23091.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1600 is in the 11th percentile; FV-230 is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FV-230 higher · +1 (+50%)16002
FV-2303
Median Utility Tractor4
1600 is in the 3rd percentile; FV-230 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FV-230 higher · +15 (+167%)16009
FV-23024
Median Utility Tractor12
1600 is in the 35th percentile; FV-230 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
1600 (A)FV-230 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1600 | FV-230 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | LE892 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 23.1hp | 23.2hp | ▲ FV-230+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ FV-230+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.6ci | 91.3ci | ▲ FV-230+13.7 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.3in | ▲ 1600+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.5in | ▲ 1600+0.4 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 100in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 54.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,690lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open-center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1600 | Yanmar FV-230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 13th percentile (23.1 hp)B · 13th percentile (23.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 92nd percentile (24)
A · 1600B · FV-230Median Utility Tractor