Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 1620
Utility
- power
- 27.4 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1620 vs Ford 8N
FordFord 1620
vs
FordFord 8N
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied162027.4 hp
8N27.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1620 is in the 19th percentile; 8N is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8N higher · +38.8 ci (+48%)162081.2 ci
8N120 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1620 is in the 13th percentile; 8N is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 8N higher · +1 (+33%)16203
8N4
Median Utility Tractor4
1620 is in the 23rd percentile; 8N is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8N higher · +484 lb (+22%)16202,233 lb
8N2,717 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1620 is in the 14th percentile; 8N is in the 19th · 5,107 models
1620 (A)8N (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1620 | 8N | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 27.4hp | 27.4hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 1620+600 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 8N+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 120ci | ▲ 8N+38.8 ci · +48% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.2in | ▲ 1620+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.7in | ▲ 8N+0.6 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Constant mesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 115in | ▲ 8N+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 48.4in | 64.8in | ▲ 8N+16.4 in · +34% |
| Height | 84.3in | 54.5in | ▲ 1620+29.8 in · +55% |
| Operating Weight | 2,233lb | 2,717lb | ▲ 8N+484 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 4.9gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 23.9hp | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,930lb | 800lb | ▲ 1620+1,130 lb · +141% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
| Power Steering | Not recorded | false | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Manual Drum | — |
| Differential Lock Type | Not recorded | Mechanical | — |
| Differential Lock Location | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1620 | Ford 8N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 28th percentile (120 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)B · 19th percentile (2,717 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · 1620B · 8NMedian Utility Tractor