Head to head · Utility

Ford 1620 vs Zetor 2011

Image not recorded
FordModel A

Ford 1620

Utility

power
27.4 hp
displacement
81.2 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 1620 specs
Image not recorded
ZetorModel B

Zetor 2011

Utility

power
27.4 hp
displacement
95.2 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
10
Full 2011 specs
FordFord 1620
vs
ZetorZetor 2011

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
162027.4 hp
201127.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

1620 is in the 19th percentile; 2011 is in the 19th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 2011 higher · +14 ci (+17%)
162081.2 ci
201195.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

1620 is in the 13th percentile; 2011 is in the 22nd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ 1620 higher · +1 (+50%)
16203
20112
Median Utility Tractor4

1620 is in the 23rd percentile; 2011 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ 2011 higher · +633 lb (+28%)
16202,233 lb
20112,866 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

1620 is in the 14th percentile; 2011 is in the 21st · 5,107 models

1620 (A)2011 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
ManufacturerFordZetor—
Model16202011—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
ManufacturerShibauraZetor—
Power Output27.4hp27.4hpSame
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,000RPM▲ 1620+600 RPM · +30%
Cylinders32▲ 1620+1 · +50%
Displacement81.2ci95.2ci▲ 2011+14 ci · +17%
Bore3.3in3.7in▲ 2011+0.4 in · +12%
Stroke3.2in4.3in▲ 2011+1.2 in · +39%

Transmission

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
TypeHydrostaticGear—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
Length112in117in▲ 2011+5 in · +4%
Width48.4in63.8in▲ 2011+15.4 in · +32%
Height84.3in57.3in▲ 1620+27 in · +47%
WheelbaseNot recorded68.1in—
Operating Weight2,233lb2,866lb▲ 2011+633 lb · +28%

Hydraulics

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
System TypeOpen centerNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
TypeLiveNot recorded—
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 22,000rpmNot recorded—

Tires

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded5.50-16—

Hitch & Towing

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch Capacity1,930lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2—
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
CoolantNot recorded2gal—

Operator Station

SpecFord 1620Zetor 2011Difference
TypeTwo-post ROPSNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 22nd percentile (95.2 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)B · 21st percentile (2,866 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 24th percentile (117 in)
A · 1620B · 2011Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageFord 1620Full spec pageZetor 2011