Head to head · Utility
Ford 1715 vs New Holland 1620
New HollandModel B
New Holland 1620
Utility
- power
- 27.3 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1715
vs
New HollandNew Holland 1620
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied171527.3 hp
162027.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1715 is in the 19th percentile; 1620 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied171581.2 ci
162081.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1715 is in the 13th percentile; 1620 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied17153
16203
Median Utility Tractor4
1715 is in the 23rd percentile; 1620 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1620 higher · +304 lb (+16%)17151,929 lb
16202,233 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1715 is in the 11th percentile; 1620 is in the 14th · 5,107 models
1715 (A)1620 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1715 | 1620 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | J843 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 27.3hp | 27.3hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 81.2ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 112in | Same |
| Width | 51.3in | 48.4in | ▲ 1715+2.9 in · +6% |
| Height | 84.4in | 84.3in | ▲ 1715+0.1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 1,929lb | 2,233lb | ▲ 1620+304 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1715 | New Holland 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.3 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 11th percentile (1,929 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · 1715B · 1620Median Utility Tractor