Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1720 vs Yanmar FV-280
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FV-280
Utility
- power
- 27.6 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1720
vs
YanmarYanmar FV-280
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1720 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)172027.8 hp
FV-28027.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1720 is in the 20th percentile; FV-280 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FV-280 higher · +0.2 ci (<1%)172091.3 ci
FV-28091.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1720 is in the 17th percentile; FV-280 is in the 20th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied17203
FV-2803
Median Utility Tractor4
1720 is in the 23rd percentile; FV-280 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
1720 (A)FV-280 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1720 | FV-280 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | N843 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 27.8hp | 27.6hp | ▲ 1720+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,650RPM | ▲ FV-280+150 RPM · +6% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.3ci | 91.5ci | ▲ FV-280+0.2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.4in | ▲ FV-280+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.5in | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 55.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 85.8in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1720 | Yanmar FV-280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (27.8 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)B · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · 1720B · FV-280Median Utility Tractor