Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1910 vs Kubota B3200
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota B3200
Utility
- power
- 32 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1910
vs
KubotaKubota B3200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied191032 hp
B320032 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1910 is in the 24th percentile; B3200 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1910 higher · +12.5 ci (+14%)1910104 ci
B320091.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1910 is in the 24th percentile; B3200 is in the 20th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ B3200 higher · +1 (+33%)19103
B32004
Median Utility Tractor4
1910 is in the 23rd percentile; B3200 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1910 higher · +1,216 lb (+69%)19102,980 lb
B32001,764 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1910 is in the 22nd percentile; B3200 is in the 9th · 5,107 models
1910 (A)B3200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 1910 | B3200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Kubota | — |
| Model | T853A | V1505 | — |
| Power Output | 32hp | 32hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ B3200+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ B3200+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 104ci | 91.5ci | ▲ 1910+12.5 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.1in | ▲ 1910+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.1in | ▲ 1910+0.8 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 98.8in | — |
| Width | 57.8in | 53.5in | ▲ 1910+4.3 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 2,980lb | 1,764lb | ▲ 1910+1,216 lb · +69% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, live | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,500rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,813lb | 1,654lb | ▲ 1910+2,159 lb · +131% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | 1.2gal | ▲ 1910+0.7 gal · +58% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota B3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 24th percentile (32 hp)B · 24th percentile (32 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 24th percentile (104 ci)B · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 22nd percentile (2,980 lb)B · 9th percentile (1,764 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 33rd percentile (57.8 in)B · 23rd percentile (53.5 in)
A · 1910B · B3200Median Utility Tractor