Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1910 vs Kubota L3200
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota L3200
Utility
- power
- 32 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 1910
vs
KubotaKubota L3200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied191032 hp
L320032 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1910 is in the 24th percentile; L3200 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1910 higher · +12.6 ci (+14%)1910104 ci
L320091.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1910 is in the 24th percentile; L3200 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied19103
L32003
Median Utility Tractor4
1910 is in the 23rd percentile; L3200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1910 higher · +4 (+50%)191012
L32008
Median Utility Tractor12
1910 is in the 50th percentile; L3200 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
1910 (A)L3200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 1910 | L3200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Kubota | — |
| Model | T853A | D1503 | — |
| Power Output | 32hp | 32hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ L3200+300 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 104ci | 91.4ci | ▲ 1910+12.6 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ 1910+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 1910+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Gear shift with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 57.8in | 55.1in | ▲ 1910+2.7 in · +5% |
| Height | Not recorded | 91.7in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,980lb | 2,425lb | ▲ 1910+555 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, live | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,813lb | 1,998lb | ▲ 1910+1,815 lb · +91% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | 1.6gal | ▲ 1910+0.3 gal · +19% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1910 | Kubota L3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 24th percentile (32 hp)B · 24th percentile (32 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 24th percentile (104 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 22nd percentile (2,980 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,425 lb)
A · 1910B · L3200Median Utility Tractor