Head to head · Utility
Ford 2610 vs Ford 820
FordFord 2610
vs
FordFord 820
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 820 higher · +1.5 hp (+4%)261042.5 hp
82044 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2610 is in the 37th percentile; 820 is in the 38th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2610 higher · +3 ci (+2%)2610175 ci
820172 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2610 is in the 46th percentile; 820 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 820 higher · +1 (+33%)26103
8204
Median Utility Tractor4
2610 is in the 23rd percentile; 820 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2610 higher · +3 (+60%)26108
8205
Median Utility Tractor12
2610 is in the 23rd percentile; 820 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
2610 (A)820 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 2610 | 820 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 2.9L 3-cyl diesel | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 42.5hp | 44hp | ▲ 820+1.5 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 820+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 820+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 175ci | 172ci | ▲ 2610+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 3.9in | ▲ 2610+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 3.6in | ▲ 2610+0.6 in · +17% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 114in | ▲ 2610+13 in · +11% |
| Width | 63.4in | 64.8in | ▲ 820+1.4 in · +2% |
| Height | 52.5in | 55.5in | ▲ 820+3 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 3,475lb | 3,400lb | ▲ 2610+75 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power assist | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 2610 | Ford 820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 820+1 gal · +36% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 37th percentile (42.5 hp)B · 38th percentile (44 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (175 ci)B · 46th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 29th percentile (3,475 lb)B · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)
A · 2610B · 820Median Utility Tractor