Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 276
Utility
- power
- 116 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 276 vs McCormick Intl X6.460
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X6.460
Utility
- power
- 131 hp
- displacement
- 275 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 54
FordFord 276
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X6.460
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X6.460 higher · +15 hp (+13%)276116 hp
X6.460131 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
276 is in the 89th percentile; X6.460 is in the 91st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X6.460 higher · +7 ci (+3%)276268 ci
X6.460275 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
276 is in the 75th percentile; X6.460 is in the 80th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2764
X6.4604
Median Utility Tractor4
276 is in the 50th percentile; X6.460 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 276 higher · +300 lb (+2%)27613,500 lb
X6.46013,200 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
276 is in the 92nd percentile; X6.460 is in the 91st · 5,107 models
276 (A)X6.460 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 276 | X6.460 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | BetaPower | — |
| Power Output | 116hp | 131hp | ▲ X6.460+15 hp · +13% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 276+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 275ci | ▲ X6.460+7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 276+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5.2in | ▲ X6.460+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | T-Tronic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 207in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 87in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 110in | — |
| Operating Weight | 13,500lb | 13,200lb | ▲ 276+300 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Articulated power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 276 | McCormick Intl X6.460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 89th percentile (116 hp)B · 91st percentile (131 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 80th percentile (275 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 92nd percentile (13,500 lb)B · 91st percentile (13,200 lb)
A · 276B · X6.460Median Utility Tractor