Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 3000 vs Yanmar YT347
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YT347
Utility
- power
- 46.6 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 3000
vs
YanmarYanmar YT347
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 3000 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)300046.7 hp
YT34746.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
3000 is in the 41st percentile; YT347 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3000 higher · +24 ci (+18%)3000158 ci
YT347134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3000 is in the 42nd percentile; YT347 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ YT347 higher · +1 (+33%)30003
YT3474
Median Utility Tractor4
3000 is in the 23rd percentile; YT347 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 3000 higher · +305 lb (+8%)30004,185 lb
YT3473,880 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
3000 is in the 39th percentile; YT347 is in the 35th · 5,107 models
3000 (A)YT347 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 3000 | YT347 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Ford 2.6L 3-cyl gasoline | 4TNV88C | — |
| Power Output | 46.7hp | 46.6hp | ▲ 3000+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ YT347+700 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ YT347+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 158ci | 134ci | ▲ 3000+24 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 3.5in | ▲ 3000+0.7 in · +20% |
| Stroke | 3.8in | 3.6in | ▲ 3000+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | hydro-mechanical CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 131in | ▲ YT347+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 63.8in | 70.9in | ▲ YT347+7.1 in · +11% |
| Height | 82.7in | 96in | ▲ YT347+13.3 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 4,185lb | 3,880lb | ▲ 3000+305 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission, live, independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,756lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.5gal | 1.6gal | ▲ 3000+1.9 gal · +119% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Yanmar YT347 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (46.7 hp)B · 41st percentile (46.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (158 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 39th percentile (4,185 lb)B · 35th percentile (3,880 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 37th percentile (127 in)B · 42nd percentile (131 in)
A · 3000B · YT347Median Utility Tractor