Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 3610 vs Iseki AT50
Image not recorded
FordFord 3610
vs
IsekiIseki AT50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ AT50 higher · +1.9 hp (+4%)361047.5 hp
AT5049.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
3610 is in the 43rd percentile; AT50 is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3610 higher · +12 ci (+7%)3610192 ci
AT50180 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3610 is in the 51st percentile; AT50 is in the 49th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ AT50 higher · +1 (+33%)36103
AT504
Median Utility Tractor4
3610 is in the 23rd percentile; AT50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ AT50 higher · +16 (+200%)36108
AT5024
Median Utility Tractor12
3610 is in the 23rd percentile; AT50 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
3610 (A)AT50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iseki | — |
| Model | 3610 | AT50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iseki | — |
| Model | Not recorded | E4DE | — |
| Power Output | 47.5hp | 49.4hp | ▲ AT50+1.9 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ AT50+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ AT50+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 192ci | 180ci | ▲ 3610+12 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.8in | ▲ 3610+0.6 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 3.9in | ▲ 3610+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 139in | ▲ AT50+12 in · +9% |
| Width | 64in | 61.4in | ▲ 3610+2.6 in · +4% |
| Height | 54in | 89.8in | ▲ AT50+35.8 in · +66% |
| Operating Weight | 3,665lb | 3,814lb | ▲ AT50+149 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 3610 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)B · 44th percentile (49.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 51st percentile (192 ci)B · 49th percentile (180 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,665 lb)B · 34th percentile (3,814 lb)
A · 3610B · AT50Median Utility Tractor