Head to head · Utility
Ford 3900 vs Massey Ferguson 2415
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2415
Utility
- power
- 47 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 3900
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2415
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied390047 hp
241547 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
3900 is in the 41st percentile; 2415 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3900 higher · +68 ci (+64%)3900175 ci
2415107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3900 is in the 46th percentile; 2415 is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 2415 higher · +1 (+33%)39003
24154
Median Utility Tractor4
3900 is in the 23rd percentile; 2415 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2415 higher · +4 (+50%)39008
241512
Median Utility Tractor12
3900 is in the 23rd percentile; 2415 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
3900 (A)2415 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 3900 | 2415 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 47hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ 2415+1,000 RPM · +50% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 2415+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 175ci | 107ci | ▲ 3900+68 ci · +64% |
| Bore | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 135in | 120in | ▲ 3900+15 in · +13% |
| Width | 73.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 90.6in | 52.2in | ▲ 3900+38.4 in · +74% |
| Operating Weight | 4,766lb | 2,910lb | ▲ 3900+1,856 lb · +64% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Massey Ferguson 2415 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 41st percentile (47 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (175 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 46th percentile (4,766 lb)B · 21st percentile (2,910 lb)
A · 3900B · 2415Median Utility Tractor