Head to head · Utility
Ford 3900 vs Renault 50-12 LB
RenaultModel B
Renault 50-12 LB
Utility
- power
- 44.3 hp
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 3900
vs
RenaultRenault 50-12 LB
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 3900 higher · +2.7 hp (+6%)390047 hp
50-12 LB44.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
3900 is in the 41st percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 38th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3900 higher · +2 ci (+1%)3900175 ci
50-12 LB173 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3900 is in the 46th percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied39003
50-12 LB3
Median Utility Tractor4
3900 is in the 23rd percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied39008
50-12 LB8
Median Utility Tractor12
3900 is in the 23rd percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
3900 (A)50-12 LB (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Renault | — |
| Model | 3900 | 50-12 LB | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F3 L 912 | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 44.3hp | ▲ 3900+2.7 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ 50-12 LB+350 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 175ci | 173ci | ▲ 3900+2 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 3.9in | ▲ 3900+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.7in | ▲ 50-12 LB+0.5 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 135in | 130in | ▲ 3900+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 73.2in | 64.6in | ▲ 3900+8.6 in · +13% |
| Height | 90.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,766lb | 4,630lb | ▲ 3900+136 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | I | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 3900 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (175 ci)B · 46th percentile (173 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 46th percentile (4,766 lb)B · 44th percentile (4,630 lb)
A · 3900B · 50-12 LBMedian Utility Tractor