Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 4000 vs Iseki AT50
Image not recorded
FordFord 4000
vs
IsekiIseki AT50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ AT50 higher · +1.5 hp (+3%)400047.9 hp
AT5049.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
4000 is in the 43rd percentile; AT50 is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ AT50 higher · +8 ci (+5%)4000172 ci
AT50180 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
4000 is in the 46th percentile; AT50 is in the 49th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied40004
AT504
Median Utility Tractor4
4000 is in the 50th percentile; AT50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ AT50 higher · +16 (+200%)40008
AT5024
Median Utility Tractor12
4000 is in the 23rd percentile; AT50 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
4000 (A)AT50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iseki | — |
| Model | 4000 | AT50 | — |
| Category | Utility, Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iseki | — |
| Model | Ford 2.8L 4-cyl gasoline | E4DE | — |
| Power Output | 47.9hp | 49.4hp | ▲ AT50+1.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ AT50+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 172ci | 180ci | ▲ AT50+8 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.8in | ▲ 4000+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.9in | ▲ AT50+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 139in | ▲ AT50+18 in · +15% |
| Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Height | 57.3in | 89.8in | ▲ AT50+32.5 in · +57% |
| Operating Weight | 3,162lb | 3,814lb | ▲ AT50+652 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Iseki AT50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (47.9 hp)B · 44th percentile (49.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (172 ci)B · 49th percentile (180 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,162 lb)B · 34th percentile (3,814 lb)
A · 4000B · AT50Median Utility Tractor