Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 4600 vs Kubota KL53Z
KubotaModel B
Kubota KL53Z
Utility
- power
- 52.3 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 4600
vs
KubotaKubota KL53Z
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 4600 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)460052.4 hp
KL53Z52.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
4600 is in the 48th percentile; KL53Z is in the 48th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 4600 higher · +52 ci (+35%)4600201 ci
KL53Z149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
4600 is in the 54th percentile; KL53Z is in the 37th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ KL53Z higher · +1 (+33%)46003
KL53Z4
Median Utility Tractor4
4600 is in the 23rd percentile; KL53Z is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 4600 higher · +1,647 lb (+39%)46005,880 lb
KL53Z4,233 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
4600 is in the 55th percentile; KL53Z is in the 40th · 5,107 models
4600 (A)KL53Z (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 4600 | KL53Z | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V2403 | — |
| Power Output | 52.4hp | 52.3hp | ▲ 4600+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ KL53Z+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ KL53Z+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 149ci | ▲ 4600+52 ci · +35% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.4in | ▲ 4600+1 in · +29% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4in | ▲ 4600+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type with dry disc clutch | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 137in | 137in | Same |
| Width | 67.3in | 61in | ▲ 4600+6.3 in · +10% |
| Height | 57.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,880lb | 4,233lb | ▲ 4600+1,647 lb · +39% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Category 1 | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,087lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc operated by two foot pedals which can be locked together | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota KL53Z | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (52.4 hp)B · 48th percentile (52.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 54th percentile (201 ci)B · 37th percentile (149 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,880 lb)B · 40th percentile (4,233 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 51st percentile (137 in)B · 50th percentile (137 in)
A · 4600B · KL53ZMedian Utility Tractor