Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 4600 vs Kubota M5270
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M5270
Utility
- power
- 52.5 hp
- displacement
- 182 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 4600
vs
KubotaKubota M5270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M5270 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)460052.4 hp
M527052.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
4600 is in the 48th percentile; M5270 is in the 48th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 4600 higher · +19 ci (+10%)4600201 ci
M5270182 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
4600 is in the 54th percentile; M5270 is in the 50th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied46003
M52703
Median Utility Tractor4
4600 is in the 23rd percentile; M5270 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M5270 higher · +8 (+100%)46008
M527016
Median Utility Tractor12
4600 is in the 23rd percentile; M5270 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
4600 (A)M5270 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 4600 | M5270 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D3000 | — |
| Power Output | 52.4hp | 52.5hp | ▲ M5270+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ M5270+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 201ci | 182ci | ▲ 4600+19 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 4600+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ M5270+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type with dry disc clutch | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 137in | 144in | ▲ M5270+7 in · +5% |
| Width | 67.3in | 64.8in | ▲ 4600+2.5 in · +4% |
| Height | 57.5in | 95.1in | ▲ M5270+37.6 in · +65% |
| Operating Weight | 5,880lb | 5,049lb | ▲ 4600+831 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | JISII/I | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 1 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,087lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc operated by two foot pedals which can be locked together | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | 3.1gal | ▲ M5270+0.3 gal · +11% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 4600 | Kubota M5270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (52.4 hp)B · 48th percentile (52.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 54th percentile (201 ci)B · 50th percentile (182 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,880 lb)B · 48th percentile (5,049 lb)
A · 4600B · M5270Median Utility Tractor