Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs IMT 2090
FordFord 5000
vs
IMTIMT 2090
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2090 higher · +21.9 hp (+32%)500069.1 hp
209091 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; 2090 is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2090 higher · +43 ci (+18%)5000233 ci
2090276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5000 is in the 63rd percentile; 2090 is in the 82nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied50004
20904
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; 2090 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2090 higher · +2 (+25%)50008
209010
Median Utility Tractor12
5000 is in the 23rd percentile; 2090 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
5000 (A)2090 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | IMT | — |
| Model | 5000 | 2090 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4045TF270 | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 91hp | ▲ 2090+21.9 hp · +32% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 2090+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 233ci | 276ci | ▲ 2090+43 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 4.2in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 5in | ▲ 2090+0.8 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 140in | — |
| Width | 68.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | 106in | ▲ 2090+42.6 in · +67% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 9,261lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | IMT 2090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 79th percentile (91 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (233 ci)B · 82nd percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 39th percentile (10)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 12th percentile (63.4 in)B · 80th percentile (106 in)
A · 5000B · 2090Median Utility Tractor