
Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs Kubota M8950


KubotaModel B
Kubota M8950
Agricultural
- power
- 96 hp
- displacement
- 262 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
FordFord 5000
vs
KubotaKubota M8950
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M8950 higher · +26.9 hp (+39%)500069.1 hp
M895096 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; M8950 is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ M8950 higher · +29 ci (+12%)5000233 ci
M8950262 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5000 is in the 63rd percentile; M8950 is in the 74th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied50004
M89504
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; M8950 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M8950 higher · +16 (+200%)50008
M895024
Median Utility Tractor12
5000 is in the 23rd percentile; M8950 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
5000 (A)M8950 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 5000 | M8950 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V4300 | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 96hp | ▲ M8950+26.9 hp · +39% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ M8950+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 233ci | 262ci | ▲ M8950+29 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 4.3in | ▲ M8950+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.5in | ▲ M8950+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 68.1in | 79.5in | ▲ M8950+11.4 in · +17% |
| Height | 63.4in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | 3.9gal | ▲ M8950+0.1 gal · +3% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Kubota M8950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 81st percentile (96 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (233 ci)B · 74th percentile (262 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Width
median 66 inA · 55th percentile (68.1 in)B · 81st percentile (79.5 in)
A · 5000B · M8950Median Utility Tractor