Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 5900 vs Ford 6600
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 6600
Standard Tread
- power
- 75.5 hp
- displacement
- 256 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 5900
vs
FordFord 6600
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 6600 higher · +2.5 hp (+3%)590073 hp
660075.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5900 is in the 66th percentile; 6600 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied5900256 ci
6600256 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5900 is in the 73rd percentile; 6600 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied59004
66004
Median Utility Tractor4
5900 is in the 50th percentile; 6600 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
5900 (A)6600 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 5900 | 6600 | — |
| Category | Utility | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Power Output | 73hp | 75.5hp | ▲ 6600+2.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 256ci | 256ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,760lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,340lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.4gal | 3.3gal | ▲ 5900+0.1 gal · +3% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5900 | Ford 6600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post fixed ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 66th percentile (73 hp)B · 68th percentile (75.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 73rd percentile (256 ci)B · 73rd percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 5900B · 6600Median Utility Tractor