Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 5900 vs John Deere 5425 Utility
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 5425 Utility
Utility
- power
- 80.5 hp
- displacement
- 275 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 5900
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5425 Utility
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5425 Utility higher · +7.5 hp (+10%)590073 hp
5425 Utility80.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5900 is in the 66th percentile; 5425 Utility is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5425 Utility higher · +19 ci (+7%)5900256 ci
5425 Utility275 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5900 is in the 73rd percentile; 5425 Utility is in the 80th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied59004
5425 Utility4
Median Utility Tractor4
5900 is in the 50th percentile; 5425 Utility is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5425 Utility higher · +1 (+13%)59008
5425 Utility9
Median Utility Tractor12
5900 is in the 23rd percentile; 5425 Utility is in the 35th · 4,941 models
5900 (A)5425 Utility (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | 5900 | 5425 Utility | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4045 | — |
| Power Output | 73hp | 80.5hp | ▲ 5425 Utility+7.5 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 5425 Utility+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 256ci | 275ci | ▲ 5425 Utility+19 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | SyncShuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,760lb | 5,701lb | ▲ 5900+59 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,340lb | 3,374lb | ▲ 5425 Utility+34 lb · +1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5900 | John Deere 5425 Utility | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post fixed ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 66th percentile (73 hp)B · 71st percentile (80.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 73rd percentile (256 ci)B · 80th percentile (275 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,760 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,701 lb)
A · 5900B · 5425 UtilityMedian Utility Tractor