Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 640 vs Massey Ferguson 1526
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1526
Utility
- power
- 24.8 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 640
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1526
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 640 higher · +6.2 hp (+25%)64031 hp
152624.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
640 is in the 24th percentile; 1526 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 640 higher · +42.6 ci (+47%)640134 ci
152691.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
640 is in the 31st percentile; 1526 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 640 higher · +1 (+33%)6404
15263
Median Utility Tractor4
640 is in the 50th percentile; 1526 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 640 higher · +1,158 lb (+62%)6403,031 lb
15261,873 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
640 is in the 23rd percentile; 1526 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
640 (A)1526 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 640 | 1526 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iseki | — |
| Model | EAE Red Tiger | E3CF-VB22 | — |
| Power Output | 31hp | 24.8hp | ▲ 640+6.2 hp · +25% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1526+600 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 640+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 134ci | 91.4ci | ▲ 640+42.6 ci · +47% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.3in | ▲ 640+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 111in | ▲ 640+10 in · +9% |
| Width | 64.6in | 49.2in | ▲ 640+15.4 in · +31% |
| Height | 58.7in | 95.5in | ▲ 1526+36.8 in · +63% |
| Operating Weight | 3,031lb | 1,873lb | ▲ 640+1,158 lb · +62% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Conventional | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,250lb | 1,323lb | ▲ 1526+73 lb · +6% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Internal expanding shoes operated by two foot pedals | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 640 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 24th percentile (31 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,031 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,873 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 29th percentile (121 in)B · 17th percentile (111 in)
A · 640B · 1526Median Utility Tractor