Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 640 vs Yanmar SX3100
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar SX3100
Utility
- power
- 31.2 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 640
vs
YanmarYanmar SX3100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ SX3100 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)64031 hp
SX310031.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
640 is in the 24th percentile; SX3100 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 640 higher · +34 ci (+34%)640134 ci
SX3100100 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
640 is in the 31st percentile; SX3100 is in the 22nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 640 higher · +1 (+33%)6404
SX31003
Median Utility Tractor4
640 is in the 50th percentile; SX3100 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 640 higher · +1,001 lb (+49%)6403,031 lb
SX31002,030 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
640 is in the 23rd percentile; SX3100 is in the 13th · 5,107 models
640 (A)SX3100 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 640 | SX3100 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | EAE Red Tiger | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 31hp | 31.2hp | ▲ SX3100+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ SX3100+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 640+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 134ci | 100ci | ▲ 640+34 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.5in | ▲ SX3100+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.5in | ▲ 640+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 109in | ▲ 640+12 in · +11% |
| Width | 64.6in | 51.6in | ▲ 640+13 in · +25% |
| Height | 58.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,031lb | 2,030lb | ▲ 640+1,001 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydraulic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Conventional | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,250lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydraulic power | — |
| Brake Type | Internal expanding shoes operated by two foot pedals | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | 0.5gal | ▲ 640+3.3 gal · +660% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 640 | Yanmar SX3100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 24th percentile (31 hp)B · 24th percentile (31.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 22nd percentile (100 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,031 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,030 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 29th percentile (121 in)B · 15th percentile (109 in)
A · 640B · SX3100Median Utility Tractor