
Head to head · Utility
Ford 641 vs Kubota STW34

Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota STW34
Utility
- power
- 32.9 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 641
vs
KubotaKubota STW34
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 641 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)64133 hp
STW3432.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
641 is in the 25th percentile; STW34 is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 641 higher · +33 ci (+33%)641134 ci
STW34101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
641 is in the 31st percentile; STW34 is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 641 higher · +1 (+33%)6414
STW343
Median Utility Tractor4
641 is in the 50th percentile; STW34 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 641 higher · +849 lb (+35%)6413,285 lb
STW342,436 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
641 is in the 26th percentile; STW34 is in the 16th · 5,107 models
641 (A)STW34 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 641 | STW34 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | EAE Red Tiger | D1703 | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 32.9hp | ▲ 641+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,201RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ STW34+499 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 641+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 134ci | 101ci | ▲ 641+33 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.6in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 116in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 46.7in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 92.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,285lb | 2,436lb | ▲ 641+849 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 641 | Kubota STW34 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 25th percentile (32.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 26th percentile (3,285 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,436 lb)
A · 641B · STW34Median Utility Tractor