Head to head · Utility
Ford 641 vs Volvo T25
FordFord 641
vs
VolvoVolvo T25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 641 higher · +2.4 hp (+8%)64133 hp
T2530.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
641 is in the 25th percentile; T25 is in the 23rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied641134 ci
T25134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
641 is in the 31st percentile; T25 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6414
T254
Median Utility Tractor4
641 is in the 50th percentile; T25 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T25 higher · +1 (+25%)6414
T255
Median Utility Tractor12
641 is in the 4th percentile; T25 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
641 (A)T25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Volvo | — |
| Model | 641 | T25 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Volvo | — |
| Model | EAE Red Tiger | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 30.6hp | ▲ 641+2.4 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,201RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 641+201 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 134ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.5in | ▲ 641+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 116in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 51.2in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,285lb | 3,461lb | ▲ T25+176 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.50-16 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | 2.9gal | ▲ 641+0.9 gal · +31% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 641 | Volvo T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 23rd percentile (30.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 33rd percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 26th percentile (3,285 lb)B · 29th percentile (3,461 lb)
A · 641B · T25Median Utility Tractor