Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 6610 vs New Holland TN95A
New HollandModel B
New Holland TN95A
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 6610
vs
New HollandNew Holland TN95A
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TN95A higher · +8 hp (+10%)661082 hp
TN95A90 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
6610 is in the 73rd percentile; TN95A is in the 78th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TN95A higher · +6 ci (+2%)6610268 ci
TN95A274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6610 is in the 75th percentile; TN95A is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied66104
TN95A4
Median Utility Tractor4
6610 is in the 50th percentile; TN95A is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TN95A higher · +4 (+50%)66108
TN95A12
Median Utility Tractor12
6610 is in the 23rd percentile; TN95A is in the 50th · 4,941 models
6610 (A)TN95A (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 6610 | TN95A | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iveco | — |
| Power Output | 82hp | 90hp | ▲ TN95A+8 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TN95A+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 274ci | ▲ TN95A+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 6610+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5.2in | ▲ TN95A+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Partially synchronized with power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 145in | 158in | ▲ TN95A+13 in · +9% |
| Width | 68.5in | 67.2in | ▲ 6610+1.3 in · +2% |
| Height | 95.7in | 95.1in | ▲ 6610+0.6 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 5,695lb | 6,118lb | ▲ TN95A+423 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Cat I and II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,136lb | 3,968lb | ▲ 6610+168 lb · +4% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 6610 | New Holland TN95A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (82 hp)B · 78th percentile (90 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 53rd percentile (5,695 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,118 lb)
A · 6610B · TN95AMedian Utility Tractor