Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 7400 vs Ford 8010
Image not recorded
FordFord 7400
vs
FordFord 8010
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 8010 higher · +6 hp (+6%)7400100 hp
8010106 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7400 is in the 84th percentile; 8010 is in the 86th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8010 higher · +76 ci (+20%)7400380 ci
8010456 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7400 is in the 89th percentile; 8010 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied74006
80106
Median Utility Tractor4
7400 is in the 93rd percentile; 8010 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8010 higher · +2 (+14%)740014
801016
Median Utility Tractor12
7400 is in the 63rd percentile; 8010 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
7400 (A)8010 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 7400 | 8010 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Power Output | 100hp | 106hp | ▲ 8010+6 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 380ci | 456ci | ▲ 8010+76 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 4.4in | ▲ 8010+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 8010+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Dual Power | Unsynchronized gear & Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 70.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 65in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,945lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 7400 | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (100 hp)B · 86th percentile (106 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 89th percentile (380 ci)B · 93rd percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 63rd percentile (14)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · 7400B · 8010Median Utility Tractor