Head to head · Row Crop
Ford 7700 vs Kubota M95X
KubotaModel B
Kubota M95X
Row Crop
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 7700
vs
KubotaKubota M95X
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7700 higher · +1.7 hp (+2%)770096.7 hp
M95X95 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
7700 is in the 22nd percentile; M95X is in the 21st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7700 higher · +26 ci (+11%)7700256 ci
M95X230 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
7700 is in the 18th percentile; M95X is in the 12th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied77004
M95X4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
7700 is in the 17th percentile; M95X is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied770016
M95X16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
7700 is in the 50th percentile; M95X is in the 50th · 1,200 models
7700 (A)M95X (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 7700 | M95X | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3800TE2 | — |
| Power Output | 96.7hp | 95hp | ▲ 7700+1.7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M95X+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 256ci | 230ci | ▲ 7700+26 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.9in | ▲ 7700+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.7in | ▲ M95X+0.5 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift with dry plate clutch | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 150in | 163in | ▲ M95X+13 in · +9% |
| Width | 74in | 83.7in | ▲ M95X+9.7 in · +13% |
| Height | 113in | 104in | ▲ 7700+9 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 8,400lb | 9,050lb | ▲ M95X+650 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,430lb | 5,203lb | ▲ M95X+773 lb · +17% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.5gal | 2.4gal | ▲ 7700+2.1 gal · +88% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 7700 | Kubota M95X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 22nd percentile (96.7 hp)B · 21st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 18th percentile (256 ci)B · 12th percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 23rd percentile (8,400 lb)B · 26th percentile (9,050 lb)
A · 7700B · M95XMedian Row Crop Tractor