Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Ford 7910 vs Valmet 8150
Image not recorded
ValmetModel B
Valmet 8150
Row Crop
- power
- 109 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 36
FordFord 7910
vs
ValmetValmet 8150
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 8150 higher · +11 hp (+11%)791098 hp
8150109 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
7910 is in the 23rd percentile; 8150 is in the 31st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8150 higher · +2 ci (<1%)7910401 ci
8150403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
7910 is in the 51st percentile; 8150 is in the 55th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied79106
81506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
7910 is in the 50th percentile; 8150 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8150 higher · +20 (+125%)791016
815036
Median Row Crop Tractor16
7910 is in the 50th percentile; 8150 is in the 95th · 1,200 models
7910 (A)8150 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | 7910 | 8150 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Six-cylinder turbocharged (Serial No. E 1 12 75) | — |
| Power Output | 98hp | 109hp | ▲ 8150+11 hp · +11% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 8150+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 403ci | ▲ 8150+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ 7910+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.7in | ▲ 8150+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Three-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 172in | 191in | ▲ 8150+19 in · +11% |
| Width | Not recorded | 85.8in | — |
| Height | 110in | 110in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 11,520lb | 10,970lb | ▲ 7910+550 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | Two 16.9R28;**; 12 (80 psi) | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | Two 20.8R38;**; 12 (80 psi) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 7910 | Valmet 8150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 23rd percentile (98 hp)B · 31st percentile (109 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 51st percentile (401 ci)B · 55th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 95th percentile (36)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 44th percentile (11,520 lb)B · 38th percentile (10,970 lb)
A · 7910B · 8150Median Row Crop Tractor