Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 8010 vs Ford 9030

FordModel B
Ford 9030
Utility
- power
- 116 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 8010
vs
FordFord 9030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9030 higher · +10 hp (+9%)8010106 hp
9030116 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8010 is in the 86th percentile; 9030 is in the 89th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8010 higher · +188 ci (+70%)8010456 ci
9030268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8010 is in the 93rd percentile; 9030 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 8010 higher · +2 (+50%)80106
90304
Median Utility Tractor4
8010 is in the 93rd percentile; 9030 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
8010 (A)9030 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 8010 | 9030 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | BSD444T | — |
| Power Output | 106hp | 116hp | ▲ 9030+10 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 8010+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 456ci | 268ci | ▲ 8010+188 ci · +70% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.4in | ▲ 8010+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear & Two-speed power shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 180in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.3in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 117in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 10,150lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed-center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Articulated Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Articulated Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 9030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 86th percentile (106 hp)B · 89th percentile (116 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 93rd percentile (456 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 8010B · 9030Median Utility Tractor