Head to head · Row Crop
Ford 8100 vs Valmet 1102
ValmetModel B
Valmet 1102
Row Crop
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 255 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 8100
vs
ValmetValmet 1102
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8100115 hp
1102115 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8100 is in the 35th percentile; 1102 is in the 35th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8100 higher · +125 ci (+49%)8100380 ci
1102255 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8100 is in the 49th percentile; 1102 is in the 18th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 8100 higher · +2 (+50%)81006
11024
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8100 is in the 50th percentile; 1102 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied810016
110216
Median Row Crop Tractor16
8100 is in the 50th percentile; 1102 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
8100 (A)1102 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | 8100 | 1102 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | 2715E | 411 BS | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 115hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 1102+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 8100+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 380ci | 255ci | ▲ 8100+125 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 4.3in | ▲ 1102+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 165in | 164in | ▲ 8100+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 78.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 115in | 106in | ▲ 8100+9 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 9,078lb | 8,598lb | ▲ 8100+480 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 1102 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 35th percentile (115 hp)B · 35th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 49th percentile (380 ci)B · 18th percentile (255 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 26th percentile (9,078 lb)B · 23rd percentile (8,598 lb)
A · 8100B · 1102Median Row Crop Tractor