Head to head · Row Crop
Ford 8100 vs Valmet 6900
Image not recorded
ValmetModel B
Valmet 6900
Row Crop
- power
- 120 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 8100
vs
ValmetValmet 6900
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 6900 higher · +5 hp (+4%)8100115 hp
6900120 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8100 is in the 35th percentile; 6900 is in the 39th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6900 higher · +23 ci (+6%)8100380 ci
6900403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8100 is in the 49th percentile; 6900 is in the 55th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied81006
69006
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8100 is in the 50th percentile; 6900 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8100 higher · +4 (+33%)810016
690012
Median Row Crop Tractor16
8100 is in the 50th percentile; 6900 is in the 27th · 1,200 models
8100 (A)6900 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | 8100 | 6900 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | SisuDiesel | — |
| Model | 2715E | 620DRE | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 120hp | ▲ 6900+5 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,550RPM | ▲ 8100+550 RPM · +35% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 380ci | 403ci | ▲ 6900+23 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 4.3in | ▲ 6900+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 6900+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | Syncro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 165in | 187in | ▲ 6900+22 in · +13% |
| Width | 78.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 115in | 109in | ▲ 8100+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 9,078lb | 9,744lb | ▲ 6900+666 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | 3 | III/II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8100 | Valmet 6900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 35th percentile (115 hp)B · 39th percentile (120 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 49th percentile (380 ci)B · 55th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 26th percentile (9,078 lb)B · 30th percentile (9,744 lb)
A · 8100B · 6900Median Row Crop Tractor