Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 8240 vs LS MT7101
FordFord 8240
vs
LSLS MT7101
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8240101 hp
MT7101101 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8240 is in the 84th percentile; MT7101 is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8240 higher · +249 ci (+120%)8240456 ci
MT7101207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8240 is in the 93rd percentile; MT7101 is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 8240 higher · +2 (+50%)82406
MT71014
Median Utility Tractor4
8240 is in the 93rd percentile; MT7101 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT7101 higher · +32 (+400%)82408
MT710140
Median Utility Tractor12
8240 is in the 23rd percentile; MT7101 is in the 99th · 4,941 models
8240 (A)MT7101 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | LS | — |
| Model | 8240 | MT7101 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford New Holland | FPT | — |
| Model | Genesis | F5G | — |
| Power Output | 101hp | 101hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,069RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT7101+131 RPM · +6% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 8240+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 456ci | 207ci | ▲ 8240+249 ci · +120% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.9in | ▲ 8240+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ 8240+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShift | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 176in | 152in | ▲ 8240+24 in · +16% |
| Width | 83in | 78.7in | ▲ 8240+4.3 in · +5% |
| Height | Not recorded | 105in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,684lb | 7,714lb | ▲ 8240+970 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Gear pump | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 16.3gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,030psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540/750/1000 | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 6,250lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc, hydraulically actuated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8240 | LS MT7101 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (101 hp)B · 84th percentile (101 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 93rd percentile (456 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 99th percentile (40)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 80th percentile (8,684 lb)B · 73rd percentile (7,714 lb)
A · 8240B · MT7101Median Utility Tractor