Head to head · Row Crop
Ford 8401 vs Valmet 8050
ValmetModel B
Valmet 8050
Row Crop
- power
- 109 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 36
FordFord 8401
vs
ValmetValmet 8050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8401109 hp
8050109 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8401 is in the 31st percentile; 8050 is in the 31st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8050 higher · +1 ci (<1%)8401402 ci
8050403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8401 is in the 51st percentile; 8050 is in the 55th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied84016
80506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8401 is in the 50th percentile; 8050 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8050 higher · +20 (+125%)840116
805036
Median Row Crop Tractor16
8401 is in the 50th percentile; 8050 is in the 95th · 1,200 models
8401 (A)8050 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | 8401 | 8050 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | SisuDiesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 6620 DSRE | — |
| Power Output | 109hp | 109hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,440RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 8401+240 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 403ci | ▲ 8050+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ 8401+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.7in | ▲ 8050+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Dual Power | Three-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 165in | 191in | ▲ 8050+26 in · +16% |
| Width | Not recorded | 85.8in | — |
| Height | 90in | 110in | ▲ 8050+20 in · +22% |
| Ground Clearance | 19in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,472lb | 11,050lb | ▲ 8050+578 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8401 | Valmet 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 31st percentile (109 hp)B · 31st percentile (109 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 51st percentile (402 ci)B · 55th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 95th percentile (36)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 35th percentile (10,472 lb)B · 40th percentile (11,050 lb)
A · 8401B · 8050Median Row Crop Tractor