Head to head · Utility
Ford 860 vs Minneapolis-Moline RTS
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline RTS
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
FordFord 860
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline RTS
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 860 higher · +7 ci (+4%)860172 ci
RTS165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
860 is in the 46th percentile; RTS is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8604
RTS4
Median Utility Tractor4
860 is in the 50th percentile; RTS is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 860 higher · +1 (+25%)8605
RTS4
Median Utility Tractor12
860 is in the 6th percentile; RTS is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 860 higher · +300 lb (+10%)8603,400 lb
RTS3,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
860 is in the 28th percentile; RTS is in the 24th · 5,107 models
860 (A)RTS (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 860 | RTS | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | EAF | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 860+700 RPM · +47% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 172ci | 165ci | ▲ 860+7 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 860+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 4in | ▲ RTS+0.4 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Unsynchronized gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 109in | ▲ 860+13 in · +12% |
| Width | 64.6in | 81.1in | ▲ RTS+16.5 in · +26% |
| Height | 59.1in | 68.5in | ▲ RTS+9.4 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 3,400lb | 3,100lb | ▲ 860+300 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 28-Dec | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,250lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Internal expanding shoes | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 6 volts | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | 3.4gal | ▲ 860+0.4 gal · +12% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 860 | Minneapolis-Moline RTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (172 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 6th percentile (5)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,100 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 30th percentile (122 in)B · 15th percentile (109 in)
A · 860B · RTSMedian Utility Tractor