Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 8670
Agricultural
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 8670 vs Schluter Super 1700LS
Image not recorded
SchluterModel B
Schluter Super 1700LS
Agricultural
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
FordFord 8670
vs
SchluterSchluter Super 1700LS
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8670170 hp
Super 1700LS170 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
8670 is in the 74th percentile; Super 1700LS is in the 74th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8670 higher · +37 ci (+9%)8670456 ci
Super 1700LS419 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
8670 is in the 82nd percentile; Super 1700LS is in the 74th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied86706
Super 1700LS6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
8670 is in the 74th percentile; Super 1700LS is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ Super 1700LS higher · +8 (+50%)867016
Super 1700LS24
Median Agricultural Tractor16
8670 is in the 50th percentile; Super 1700LS is in the 81st · 972 models
8670 (A)Super 1700LS (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Schluter | — |
| Model | 8670 | Super 1700LS | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Schluter | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D 0826 LE 503 | — |
| Power Output | 170hp | 170hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Super 1700LS+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 456ci | 419ci | ▲ 8670+37 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ 8670+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.9in | ▲ 8670+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 197in | 187in | ▲ 8670+10 in · +5% |
| Width | 96.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 121in | 113in | ▲ 8670+8 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 18,199lb | 14,112lb | ▲ 8670+4,087 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R42 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 10,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Schluter Super 1700LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 74th percentile (170 hp)B · 74th percentile (170 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 82nd percentile (456 ci)B · 74th percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 81st percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 79th percentile (18,199 lb)B · 66th percentile (14,112 lb)
A · 8670B · Super 1700LSMedian Agricultural Tractor