Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 8670
Agricultural
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 8670 vs Steyr 9170
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 9170
Agricultural
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
FordFord 8670
vs
SteyrSteyr 9170
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8670170 hp
9170170 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
8670 is in the 74th percentile; 9170 is in the 74th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8670 higher · +53 ci (+13%)8670456 ci
9170403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
8670 is in the 82nd percentile; 9170 is in the 67th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied86706
91706
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
8670 is in the 74th percentile; 9170 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9170 higher · +16 (+100%)867016
917032
Median Agricultural Tractor16
8670 is in the 50th percentile; 9170 is in the 91st · 972 models
8670 (A)9170 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | 8670 | 9170 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 620DS | — |
| Power Output | 170hp | 170hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 9170+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 456ci | 403ci | ▲ 8670+53 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ 8670+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ 8670+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 197in | 204in | ▲ 9170+7 in · +4% |
| Width | 96.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 121in | 115in | ▲ 8670+6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 18,199lb | 13,451lb | ▲ 8670+4,748 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/70R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R42 | 20.8R32 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 10,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr 9170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 74th percentile (170 hp)B · 74th percentile (170 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 82nd percentile (456 ci)B · 67th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 79th percentile (18,199 lb)B · 63rd percentile (13,451 lb)
A · 8670B · 9170Median Agricultural Tractor