Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 8670
Agricultural
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 8670 vs Steyr CVT 170
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr CVT 170
Agricultural
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 8670
vs
SteyrSteyr CVT 170
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8670170 hp
CVT 170170 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
8670 is in the 74th percentile; CVT 170 is in the 74th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8670 higher · +53 ci (+13%)8670456 ci
CVT 170403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
8670 is in the 82nd percentile; CVT 170 is in the 67th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied86706
CVT 1706
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
8670 is in the 74th percentile; CVT 170 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8670 higher · +3,536 lb (+24%)867018,199 lb
CVT 17014,663 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
8670 is in the 79th percentile; CVT 170 is in the 68th · 971 models
8670 (A)CVT 170 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | 8670 | CVT 170 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Sisu | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 620.9 | — |
| Power Output | 170hp | 170hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ CVT 170+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 456ci | 403ci | ▲ 8670+53 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ 8670+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ 8670+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Continuously variable | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 197in | 189in | ▲ 8670+8 in · +4% |
| Width | 96.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 121in | 120in | ▲ 8670+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 18,199lb | 14,663lb | ▲ 8670+3,536 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R42 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 10,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8670 | Steyr CVT 170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 74th percentile (170 hp)B · 74th percentile (170 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 82nd percentile (456 ci)B · 67th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 79th percentile (18,199 lb)B · 68th percentile (14,663 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 75th percentile (197 in)B · 70th percentile (189 in)
A · 8670B · CVT 170Median Agricultural Tractor