Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 8700 vs International Harvester 1026
International HarvesterModel B
International Harvester 1026
Utility
- power
- 127 hp
- displacement
- 407 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 8700
vs
International HarvesterInternational Harvester 1026
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8700127 hp
1026127 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8700 is in the 91st percentile; 1026 is in the 91st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1026 higher · +6 ci (+1%)8700401 ci
1026407 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8700 is in the 90th percentile; 1026 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied87006
10266
Median Utility Tractor4
8700 is in the 93rd percentile; 1026 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8700 higher · +1,170 lb (+11%)870012,270 lb
102611,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
8700 is in the 90th percentile; 1026 is in the 88th · 5,107 models
8700 (A)1026 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | International Harvester | — |
| Model | 8700 | 1026 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Not recorded | DT-407 | — |
| Power Output | 127hp | 127hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 1026+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 407ci | ▲ 1026+6 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ 8700+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.6in | ▲ 1026+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type with dry disc clutch | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 180in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 79.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 119in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,270lb | 11,100lb | ▲ 8700+1,170 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | 1000 RPM | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 1,000rpm | ▲ 1026+460 rpm · +85% |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volts | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | 6gal | ▲ 1026+0.7 gal · +13% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8700 | International Harvester 1026 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 91st percentile (127 hp)B · 91st percentile (127 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (401 ci)B · 90th percentile (407 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 90th percentile (12,270 lb)B · 88th percentile (11,100 lb)
A · 8700B · 1026Median Utility Tractor