Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 8700 vs New Holland T6070 Plus
New HollandModel B
New Holland T6070 Plus
Utility
- power
- 128 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 8700
vs
New HollandNew Holland T6070 Plus
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T6070 Plus higher · +1 hp (<1%)8700127 hp
T6070 Plus128 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8700 is in the 91st percentile; T6070 Plus is in the 91st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T6070 Plus higher · +10 ci (+2%)8700401 ci
T6070 Plus411 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8700 is in the 90th percentile; T6070 Plus is in the 91st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied87006
T6070 Plus6
Median Utility Tractor4
8700 is in the 93rd percentile; T6070 Plus is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied870016
T6070 Plus16
Median Utility Tractor12
8700 is in the 73rd percentile; T6070 Plus is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
8700 (A)T6070 Plus (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 8700 | T6070 Plus | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | CNH Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 127hp | 128hp | ▲ T6070 Plus+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 8700+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 411ci | ▲ T6070 Plus+10 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 8700+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5.2in | ▲ T6070 Plus+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type with dry disc clutch | selective gear fixed ratio with partial (8) range operator controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 180in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 79.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 119in | 115in | ▲ 8700+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 12,270lb | 13,130lb | ▲ T6070 Plus+860 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | closed center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | 1,000rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | front wheel assist | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | wet disc hydraulically actuated by two foot pedals that can be locked together | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8700 | New Holland T6070 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 91st percentile (127 hp)B · 91st percentile (128 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (401 ci)B · 91st percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 90th percentile (12,270 lb)B · 91st percentile (13,130 lb)
A · 8700B · T6070 PlusMedian Utility Tractor