Image not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 876 vs Ford FW-30
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford FW-30
Utility
- power
- 265 hp
- displacement
- 903 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 876
vs
FordFord FW-30
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 876 higher · +15 hp (+6%)876280 hp
FW-30265 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
876 is in the 92nd percentile; FW-30 is in the 90th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-30 higher · +292 ci (+48%)876611 ci
FW-30903 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
876 is in the 93rd percentile; FW-30 is in the 97th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-30 higher · +2 (+33%)8766
FW-308
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
876 is in the 74th percentile; FW-30 is in the 99th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ FW-30 higher · +13,210 lb (+73%)87618,100 lb
FW-3031,310 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
876 is in the 79th percentile; FW-30 is in the 95th · 971 models
876 (A)FW-30 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 876 | FW-30 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Cummins | Same |
| Model | LT10-A280 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 265hp | ▲ 876+15 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ FW-30+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ FW-30+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 611ci | 903ci | ▲ FW-30+292 ci · +48% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 5.5in | ▲ FW-30+0.6 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 4.8in | ▲ 876+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | 267in | ▲ FW-30+7 in · +3% |
| Height | Not recorded | 94.3in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,100lb | 31,310lb | ▲ FW-30+13,210 lb · +73% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center load sensing | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Articulated power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN/III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Articulated power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | 12 volts | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 14.1gal | 16.9gal | ▲ FW-30+2.8 gal · +20% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 876 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 92nd percentile (280 hp)B · 90th percentile (265 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (611 ci)B · 97th percentile (903 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 79th percentile (18,100 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,310 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 97th percentile (260 in)B · 99th percentile (267 in)
A · 876B · FW-30Median Agricultural Tractor