Image not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 876 vs Steyr 8300
SteyrModel B
Steyr 8300
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 594 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 876
vs
SteyrSteyr 8300
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 876 higher · +20 hp (+8%)876280 hp
8300260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
876 is in the 92nd percentile; 8300 is in the 89th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 876 higher · +17 ci (+3%)876611 ci
8300594 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
876 is in the 93rd percentile; 8300 is in the 92nd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8766
83006
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
876 is in the 74th percentile; 8300 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 876 higher · +6,965 lb (+63%)87618,100 lb
830011,135 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
876 is in the 79th percentile; 8300 is in the 51st · 971 models
876 (A)8300 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | 876 | 8300 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Steyr | — |
| Model | LT10-A280 | WD 615.84 | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 260hp | ▲ 876+20 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 8300+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 594ci | ▲ 876+17 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 5in | ▲ 8300+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 5.1in | ▲ 876+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | 180in | ▲ 876+80 in · +44% |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,100lb | 11,135lb | ▲ 876+6,965 lb · +63% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volts | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 14.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 876 | Steyr 8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 92nd percentile (280 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (611 ci)B · 92nd percentile (594 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 79th percentile (18,100 lb)B · 51st percentile (11,135 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 97th percentile (260 in)B · 58th percentile (180 in)
A · 876B · 8300Median Agricultural Tractor