Image not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 876 vs Valtra Q285
ValtraModel B
Valtra Q285
Agricultural
- power
- 282 hp
- displacement
- 450 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 876
vs
ValtraValtra Q285
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ Q285 higher · +2 hp (<1%)876280 hp
Q285282 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
876 is in the 92nd percentile; Q285 is in the 92nd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 876 higher · +161 ci (+36%)876611 ci
Q285450 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
876 is in the 93rd percentile; Q285 is in the 80th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8766
Q2856
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
876 is in the 74th percentile; Q285 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Q285 higher · +2,183 lb (+12%)87618,100 lb
Q28520,283 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
876 is in the 79th percentile; Q285 is in the 85th · 971 models
876 (A)Q285 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valtra | — |
| Model | 876 | Q285 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | LT10-A280 | 74 LFTN-D5 | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 282hp | ▲ Q285+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,950RPM | ▲ 876+150 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 450ci | ▲ 876+161 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 876+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 5.3in | ▲ 876+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | full power shift | Continuously-Variable Transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | 219in | ▲ 876+41 in · +19% |
| Width | Not recorded | 100in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 131in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,100lb | 20,283lb | ▲ Q285+2,183 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center load sensing | Closed-center load sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volts | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 14.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 876 | Valtra Q285 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 92nd percentile (280 hp)B · 92nd percentile (282 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (611 ci)B · 80th percentile (450 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 79th percentile (18,100 lb)B · 85th percentile (20,283 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 97th percentile (260 in)B · 89th percentile (219 in)
A · 876B · Q285Median Agricultural Tractor