Head to head · Utility
Ford 8770 vs Steiger Puma 1000
Image not recorded
SteigerModel B
Steiger Puma 1000
Utility
- power
- 190 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 8770
vs
SteigerSteiger Puma 1000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8770190 hp
Puma 1000190 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8770 is in the 94th percentile; Puma 1000 is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 1000 higher · +49 ci (+11%)8770456 ci
Puma 1000505 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8770 is in the 93rd percentile; Puma 1000 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied87706
Puma 10006
Median Utility Tractor4
8770 is in the 93rd percentile; Puma 1000 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8770 higher · +20 (+167%)877032
Puma 100012
Median Utility Tractor12
8770 is in the 97th percentile; Puma 1000 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
8770 (A)Puma 1000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steiger | — |
| Model | 8770 | Puma 1000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | CDC | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 6CTA | — |
| Power Output | 190hp | 190hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 456ci | 505ci | ▲ Puma 1000+49 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ Puma 1000+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.3in | ▲ Puma 1000+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift, Creep | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 197in | 242in | ▲ Puma 1000+45 in · +23% |
| Width | 96.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 130in | ▲ Puma 1000+6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 16,600lb | 17,000lb | ▲ Puma 1000+400 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 31,500lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.6gal | 8.8gal | ▲ Puma 1000+2.2 gal · +33% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steiger Puma 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (190 hp)B · 94th percentile (190 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 93rd percentile (456 ci)B · 94th percentile (505 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,600 lb)B · 94th percentile (17,000 lb)
A · 8770B · Puma 1000Median Utility Tractor