Head to head · Utility
Ford 8770 vs Steyr 6190 CVT
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 6190 CVT
Utility
- power
- 193 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 8770
vs
SteyrSteyr 6190 CVT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 6190 CVT higher · +3 hp (+2%)8770190 hp
6190 CVT193 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8770 is in the 94th percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8770 higher · +53 ci (+13%)8770456 ci
6190 CVT403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8770 is in the 93rd percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied87706
6190 CVT6
Median Utility Tractor4
8770 is in the 93rd percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8770 higher · +1,670 lb (+11%)877016,600 lb
6190 CVT14,930 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
8770 is in the 94th percentile; 6190 CVT is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
8770 (A)6190 CVT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | 8770 | 6190 CVT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Sisu | — |
| Power Output | 190hp | 193hp | ▲ 6190 CVT+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 456ci | 403ci | ▲ 8770+53 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ 8770+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ 8770+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift, Creep | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 197in | 188in | ▲ 8770+9 in · +5% |
| Width | 96.7in | 98in | ▲ 6190 CVT+1.3 in · +1% |
| Height | 124in | 118in | ▲ 8770+6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 16,600lb | 14,930lb | ▲ 8770+1,670 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 31,500lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8770 | Steyr 6190 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (190 hp)B · 94th percentile (193 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 93rd percentile (456 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,600 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,930 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 94th percentile (197 in)B · 92nd percentile (188 in)
A · 8770B · 6190 CVTMedian Utility Tractor