Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Ford 9700 vs New Holland T6050 Elite
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T6050 Elite
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 9700
vs
New HollandNew Holland T6050 Elite
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tied9700146 hp
T6050 Elite146 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
9700 is in the 55th percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 55th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T6050 Elite higher · +10 ci (+2%)9700401 ci
T6050 Elite411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
9700 is in the 51st percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied97006
T6050 Elite6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
9700 is in the 50th percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied970016
T6050 Elite16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
9700 is in the 50th percentile; T6050 Elite is in the 50th · 1,200 models
9700 (A)T6050 Elite (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 9700 | T6050 Elite | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | CNH | — |
| Model | Ford | CNH series | — |
| Power Output | 146hp | 146hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 411ci | ▲ T6050 Elite+10 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 9700+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5.2in | ▲ T6050 Elite+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear with dry disc clutch | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 180in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 79.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 119in | 112in | ▲ 9700+7 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 12,860lb | 12,270lb | ▲ 9700+590 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540/1000 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Wet disc, hydraulically actuated by two foot pedals | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 9700 | New Holland T6050 Elite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 55th percentile (146 hp)B · 55th percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 51st percentile (401 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 54th percentile (12,860 lb)B · 50th percentile (12,270 lb)
A · 9700B · T6050 EliteMedian Row Crop Tractor